Specific Family Refusal to Donate Bones for Transplantation

Authors

Keywords:

Tissue and Organ Procurement, Tissue Donors, Bone and Bones, Bone Banks, Nursing

Abstract

Introduction:  Bone tissue is used in patients who need bone repair o reconstruction and in dental procedures. Objectives:  To analyze the factors associated with and the trend of specific refusal of bone donation by an organ procurement organization in the state of São Paulo, Brazil. Methods:  A cross-sectional study was conducted using data from 1,713 organ and tissue donation authorization forms from 2001 to 2020, provided by an organ procurement organization in the city of São Paulo. The study variables were year, age group, sex, cause of death, type of hospital, and donated and refused bones. The analysis was conducted using both descriptive and inferential statistics, employing chi-square tests, trend analysis, linear regression, and multiple logistic regression. Results:  Bone donation was refused in 896 (52.30%) of effective donors, the majority of whom were male (513; 57.2%; p = 0.009) and aged 41 to 59 years (372; 41.5%; p = 0.018). From 2001 to 2009, there was a downward trend in bone donation refusals in the 0 to 11 and 12 to 19 age groups; however, there was an upward trend in refusals among those aged ≥ 60 years. In the period from 2010 to 2020, the trend of refusals remained decreasing in the age group from 0 to 11 years. From 2001 to 2020, the chance of people refusing bone donation was 24% lower in males (p = 0.001), 30% lower in the 20 to 40 age group (p = 0.017), 46% lower in the 41-59 age group (p < 0.001), and 51% lower in the ≥ 60 age group (p < 0.001). Conclusion:  Over the last few years, there has been a decrease in the rate of refusal to donate bones. However, strategies targeting age groups involving young adults should be implemented, as they present higher refusal rates.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. El Hage S, Santos MJ, Moraes EL, Barros e Silva LB. Bone tissue donation: tendency and hurdles. Transplant Proc, 2018; 50(2): 394-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2017.11.071

2. Brito ÁN, Santos MJ, Pimentel RRS. Skin donation for transplantation: social representations of family members who (do not) give consent for collection. Burns, 2024; 50(3): 709-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2023.12.004

3. Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Portaria de Consolidação nº 4/GM MS, de 3 de outubro de 2017. Brasília (DF): MS; 2017. Available at: https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/saudelegis/gm/2017/prc0004_03_10_2017.html

4. Hidalgo BRG, Pimentel RRS, Santos MJD, Moraes EL. Trends in organ- and tissue-specific donation refusals in São Paulo, Brazil: a quantitative cross-sectional study. Sao Paulo Med J, 2025; 143(3) e2024175. https://doi.org/10.1590/1516-3180.2024.0175.R1.29112024

5. Pompeu MH, Silva SS, Roza BA. Fatores envolvidos na negativa da doação de tecido ósseo. Acta Paul Enferm, 2014; 27(4): 380-4. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0194201400063

6. Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Portaria Nº 2.600, de 21de outubro de 2009. Brasília (DF): MS; 2009; Available at: https://bvsms. saude.gov.br/bvs/saudelegis/gm/2009/prt2600_21_10_2009.html

7. Roza BA, Schuantes-Paim SM, Oliveira PC, Malosti RD, Knhis NS, Menjivar A, et al. Reasons for organ and tissue donation refusal and opposition: a scoping review. Rev Panam Salud Publica, 2024; 48: e115. https://doi.org/10.26633/RPSP.2024.115

8. Pompeu MH. Aspectos intervenientes na efetivação da doação do tecido ósseo durante o acolhimento e a entrevista familiar para doação de órgãos e tecidos. Ribeirão Preto. Tese [Doutorado em Enfermagem] – Universidade de São Paulo; 2018. https://doi.org/10.11606/T.22.2019.tde-28012019-151736

9. Dalbem GG, Caregnato RCA. Doação de órgãos e tecidos para transplante: recusa das famílias. Texto Contexto Enferm, 2010; 19(4), 728-35. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-07072010000400016

10. Leite NF, Maranhão TLG, Farias AA. Captação de múltiplos órgãos: os desafios do processo para os profissionais da saúde e familiares. ID on line Rev Psicol, 2017; 11(34): 246-70. https://doi.org/10.14295/idonline.v11i34.687

11. Aranda RS, Zillmer JGV, Gonçalves KD, Porto AR, Soares ER, Geppert AK. Perfil e motivos de negativas de familiares para doação de órgãos e tecidos para transplante. Rev Baiana Enferm, 2018; 32: e27560. Available at: https://pesquisa.bvsalud.org/portal/resource/pt/biblio-1003307

12. Bernardes ARB, Almeida CG. Estudo do perfil dos doadores elegíveis de órgãos e tecidos no Hospital de Clínicas da Universidade Federal de Uberlândia/MG. Braz J Transplant, 2015; 18(2): 34-64. https://doi.org/10.53855/bjt.v18i2.125

13. Associação Brasileira de Transplantes. Dimensionamento dos transplantes no Brasil e em cada estado (2024). Registro Brasileiro de Transplantes, 2024; XXXI (4). Available at: https://site.abto.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/rbt-n4-2024-populacao.pdf

14. Moraes EL, Massarollo MCKB. Recusa de doação de órgãos e tecidos para transplante relatados por familiares de potenciais doadores. Acta Paul Enferm, 2009; 22(2): 131-5. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-21002009000200003

15. Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Instituto Nacional de Traumatologia e Ortopedia. Banco de tecidos musculoesqueléticos. Rio de Janeiro (RJ): INTO, [s.d.]. Available at: https://www.into.saude.gov.br/banco-de-tecidos/publico-geral

16. Brasil. Lei nº 10.211, de 23 de março de 2001. Brasília (DF): Presidência da República; 2001, Available at: https://www. planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/leis_2001/l10211.htm

17. Associação Brasileira de Transplante de Órgãos. Dimensionamento dos transplantes no Brasil e em cada estado (2020). Registro Brasileiro de Transplantes, 2020; XXVI (4). Available at: https://site.abto.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/rbt_2020_populacao-1-1.pdf

Published

2026-01-16

How to Cite

1.
Hidalgo BRG, Pires AP de O, Gonçalves Neto C, Vieira GS, Oliveira GP, Silva ICN da, et al. Specific Family Refusal to Donate Bones for Transplantation. bjt [Internet]. 2026 Jan. 16 [cited 2026 Jan. 23];29. Available from: https://bjt.emnuvens.com.br/revista/article/view/750

Issue

Section

Original Paper