Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors in Diabetic Kidney Transplant Recipients: Impact on Glycemic Control, Graft Function, and Proteinuria

Authors

Keywords:

Sodium-Glucose Transport Proteins, Diabetes Mellitus, Kidney Transplantation, Immunosuppressive agents, Graft Survival

Abstract

Introduction:  Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) improve albuminuria, the rate of chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression, and cardiovascular death in non-transplant patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and proteinuria. However, kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) were excluded from the most extensive trials. This study aimed to evaluate graft function, proteinuria, and glycemic control in KTRs with pre- and post-transplant DM (PTDM) treated with SGLT2i. Methods:  This is a single-center, retrospective, and observational study including transplant recipients older than 18 years old at transplantation, diagnosed with pre-transplant type 2 DM or PTDM, who were treated with SGLT2i after transplantation from June 2020 to June 2024. Results:  Out of 1,883 KTRs followed at the center from June 2020 to June 2024, 31 patients received SGLT2i, 14 (45.2%) with pre-transplant DM, and 17 (54.8%) with PTDM. Fourteen (45.2%) completed the 24-month follow-up, including eight (57.1%) in the pre-transplant DM group and six (42.8%) in the PTDM group. In the pre-transplant DM group, fasting blood glucose (FBG) (134 [92-295] mg/dL vs. 109 [73-207], p = 0.24), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (59.3 ± 19.2 vs. 68.1 ± 23.4, p = 0.35), and urinary protein-to-creatinine ratio (UPCR) (0.3 [0.0-1.9] vs. 0.3 [0.1-0.7], p = 0.80) remained stable. In the PTDM group, there was also no difference in the parameters analyzed, whether FBG (113 [95-225] mg/dL vs. 108 [92-149], p = 0.38), eGFR (73.1 ± 26.8 vs. 69.1 ± 28.9, p = 0.76), or UPCR (0.2 [0.1-2.5] vs. 0.2 [0.1-0.4], p = 0.21). Conclusion:  These results suggest that the treatment has a beneficial effect on preserving graft function over a 2-year follow-up period. The treatment was well tolerated, with a low incidence of urinary tract infection or graft dysfunction.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Koye DN, Magliano DJ, Nelson RG, Pavkov ME. The global epidemiology of diabetes and kidney disease. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis, 2018; 25(2): 121-32. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ackd.2017.10.011

2. Rossi MR, Mazzali M, de Sousa MV. Oral glucose tolerance test as a risk marker for developing post transplant diabetes mellitus. Transplant Proc, 2024; 56(5): 1061-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2024.04.021

3. Chakkera HA, Weil EJ, Pham PT, Pomeroy J, Knowler WC. Can new-onset diabetes after kidney transplant be prevented? Diabetes Care, 2013; 36(5): 1406-12. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc12-2067

4. Paek JH, Kang SS, Park WY, Jin K, Park SB, Han S, et al. Incidence of post-transplantation diabetes mellitus within 1 year after kidney transplantation and related factors in Korean cohort study. Transplant Proc, 2019; 51(8): 2714-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2019.02.054

5. Rossi MR, Mazzali M, de Sousa MV. Post-transplant diabetes mellitus: risk factors and outcomes in a 5 year follow-up. Front Clin Diabetes Healthc, 2024; 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcdhc.2024.1336896

6. Birdwell KA, Park M. Post-transplant cardiovascular disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol, 2021; 16(12): 1878-89. https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.00520121

7. Rodríguez-Rodríguez AE, Porrini E, Hornum M, Donate-Correa J, Morales-Febles R, Khemlani Ramchand S, et al. Posttransplant diabetes mellitus and prediabetes in renal transplant recipients: an update. Nephron, 2021; 145(4): 317-29. https://doi.org/10.1159/000514288

8. Lin H, Yan J, Yuan L, Qi B, Zhang Z, Zhang W, et al. Impact of diabetes mellitus developing after kidney transplantation on patient mortality and graft survival: a meta-analysis of adjusted data. Diabetol Metab Syndr, 2021; 13(1): 126. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13098-021-00742-4

9. Heerspink HJL, Kosiborod M, Inzucchi SE, Cherney DZI. Renoprotective effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors. Kidney Int, 2018; 94(1): 26-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kint.2017.12.027

10. Montada-Atin T, PrasadGVR. Recent advances in new-onset diabetes mellitus after kidney transplantation. World J Diabetes, 2021; 12(5): 541-55. https://doi.org/10.4239/wjd.v12.i5.541

11. Pollock C, Stefánsson B, Reyner D, Rossing P, Sjöström CD, Wheeler DC, et al. Albuminuria-lowering effect of dapagliflozin alone and in combination with saxagliptin and effect of dapagliflozin and saxagliptin on glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease (DELIGHT): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol, 2019; 7(6): 429-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(19)30086-5

12. Heerspink HJL, Stefánsson BV, Correa-Rotter R, Chertow GM, Greene T, Hou FF, et al. Dapagliflozin in patients with chronic kidney disease. N Engl J Med, 2020; 383(15): 1436-46. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2024816

13. Perkovic V, Jardine MJ, Neal B, Bompoint S, Heerspink HJL, Charytan DM, et al. Canagliflozin and renal outcomes in type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. N Engl J Med, 2019; 380(24): 2295-306. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1811744

14. Suijk DLS, van Baar MJB, van Bommel EJM, Iqbal Z, Krebber MM, Vallon V, et al. SGLT2 inhibition and uric acid excretion in patients with type 2 diabetes and normal kidney function. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol, 2022; 17(5): 663-71. https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.11480821

15. Mahling M, Schork A, Nadalin S, Fritsche A, Heyne N, Guthoff M. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibition in kidney transplant recipients with diabetes mellitus. Kidney Blood Press Res, 2019; 44(5): 984-92. https://doi.org/10.1159/000501854

16. Heerspink HJL, Perco P, Mulder S, Leierer J, Hansen MK, Heinzel A, et al. Canagliflozin reduces inflammation and fibrosis biomarkers: a potential mechanism of action for beneficial effects of SGLT2 inhibitors in diabetic kidney disease. Diabetologia, 2019; 62(7): 1154-66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-019-4859-4

17. McGill JB, Subramanian S. Safety of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors. Am J Cardiol, 2019; 124: S45-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2019.08.006

18. Francis RS. SGLT2i after kidney transplantation: ready for prime time? Transplantation, 2022; 106(9): 1732-3. https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000004227

19. Lim JH, Kwon S, Jeon Y, Kim YH, Kwon H, Kim YS, et al. The efficacy and safety of SGLT2 inhibitors in diabetic kidney transplant recipients. Transplantation, 2022; 106(9): e404-12. https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000004228

20. Schwaiger E, Burghart L, Signorini L, Ristl R, Kopecky C, Tura A, et al. Empagliflozin in posttransplantation diabetes mellitus: a prospective, interventional pilot study on glucose metabolism, fluid volume, and patient safety. Am J Transplant, 2019; 19(3): 907-19. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.15223

21. Halden TAS, Kvitne KE, Midtvedt K, Rajakumar L, Robertsen I, Brox J, et al. Efficacy and safety of empagliflozin in renal transplant recipients with posttransplant diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care, 2019; 42(6): 1067-74. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc19-0093

22. Shah M, Virani Z, Rajput P, Shah B. Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin in kidney transplant patients. Indian J Nephrol, 2019; 29(4): 278-81. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijn.IJN_2_18

23. Sánchez Fructuoso AI, Bedia Raba A, Banegas Deras E, Vigara Sánchez LA, Valero San Cecilio R, Franco Esteve A, et al. Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor therapy in kidney transplant patients with type 2 or post-transplant diabetes: an observational multicentre study. Clin Kidney J, 2023; 16(6): 1022-34. https://doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfad007

24. Agarwal R. Pathogenesis of diabetic nephropathy. ADA Clinical Compendia, 2021; 2021(1) :2-7. https://doi.org/10.2337/db20211-2

25. Attallah N, Yassine L. Use of empagliflozin in recipients of kidney transplant: a report of 8 cases. Transplant Proc, 2019; 51(10): 3275-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2019.05.023

26. Ujjawal A, Schreiber B, Verma A. Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) in kidney transplant recipients: what is the evidence? Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab, 2022; 13. https://doi.org/10.1177/20420188221090001

27. AlKindi F, Al-Omary HL, Hussain Q, Al Hakim M, Chaaban A, Boobes Y. Outcomes of SGLT2 inhibitors use in diabetic renal transplant patients. Transplant Proc, 2020; 52(1): 175-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2019.11.007

28. Oliveras L, Montero N, Cruzado JM. Searching in the maze: sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors in kidney transplant recipients to improve survival. Clin Kidney J, 2023; 16(6): 909-13. https://doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfad045

29. Gibson C, Mount R, Valentine H, Sullivan D. Weight change in kidney transplant recipients: an academic medical centerbased study. Curr Dev Nutr, 2020; 4:nzaa063_035. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdn/nzaa063_035

30. Vallon V, Verma S. Effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on kidney and cardiovascular function. Annu Rev Physiol, 2021; 83(1): 503-28. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-physiol-031620-095920

31. Chewcharat A, Prasitlumkum N, Thongprayoon C, Bathini T, Medaura J, Vallabhajosyula S, et al. Efficacy and safety of SGLT-2 inhibitors for treatment of diabetes mellitus among kidney transplant patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Sci, 2020; 8(4): 47. https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci8040047

32. Lemke A, Brokmeier HM, Leung SB, Mara KC, Mour GK, Wadei HM, et al. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors for treatment of diabetes mellitus after kidney transplantation. Clin Transplant, 2022; 36(8): e14718. https://doi.org/10.1111/ctr.14718

33. Polychronopoulou E, Bourdon F, Teta D. SGLT2 inhibitors in diabetic and non-diabetic kidney transplant recipients: current knowledge and expectations. Front Nephrol, 2024; 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneph.2024.1332397

Published

2025-10-17

How to Cite

1.
Rossi MR, Kawai LHR, Mazzali M, de Sousa MV. Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors in Diabetic Kidney Transplant Recipients: Impact on Glycemic Control, Graft Function, and Proteinuria. bjt [Internet]. 2025 Oct. 17 [cited 2025 Oct. 22];28. Available from: https://bjt.emnuvens.com.br/revista/article/view/717

Issue

Section

Original Paper