Increasing Corneal Donations in a Private Hospital: The Impact of Improvement Strategies on Hospital Organ Procurement Teams
Keywords:
CIHDOTT, E-DOT, Cornea Donation, Tissue DonationAbstract
Objectives: In recent years, there has been a notable increase in cornea donations in the state of Bahia, Brazil. However, this has been accompanied by an exponential rise in the number of individuals on the waiting list for corneal transplants, resulting in a growing deviation from the goal of achieving a “zero waitlist.” To improve the organ and tissue procurement process, the hospital organ donation teams for transplantation (equipes hospitalares de doação para transplantes [E-DOTs]) have been established. Despite their critical role in expediting this process, significant unfamiliarity with their operation and impact persists. This study aimed to evaluate cornea procurements at Hospital São Rafael (HSR) from 2019 to 2025 and assess the impact of a bundle of improvement actions implemented in December 2019, including the management of quality indicators in 2022, by comparing outcomes before and after these measures. Methods: This descriptive, retrospective, ecological study analyzed HSR’s cornea procurement data from 2019 to 2025 to evaluate the impact of a bundle of improvement measures. Key outcomes and process indicators were compared before and after implementation. The bundle, developed by a multidisciplinary team, included expanding committee membership, providing early psychological support to families, training healthcare staff to identify potential donors, enhancing E-DOT members’ communication skills, and actively managing key indicators such as donor identification, family consent, and effective donations. Results: Analysis of E-DOT indicators demonstrated that, in absolute numbers, cornea donations increased from one cornea in 2019 (team reorganization) to 14 donors in 2021 (before the implementation of the bundle) and to 35 in 2025. The identification rate was 33% in 2021, 66% in 2022, and 88% in 2025. Conclusion: The implementation of measures to improve the identification and procurement of corneas, along with effective management of the quality indicators of the E-DOT, resulted in a significant increase in cornea donation rates at a private hospital. It is concluded that it is crucial to strengthen local E-DOTs with dedicated hours, continuous presence of members, and ongoing training. These improvements will enable an increase in the number of cornea donors and, consequently, an increase in the number of corneal transplants performed.
Downloads
References
1. Brasil. Governo do Estado da Bahia. Secretaria de Saúde. Estatísticas de transplantes na Bahia. Salvador (BA): Secretaria de Saúde; no date. Available at: https://www.saude.ba.gov.br/transplantes/estatisticas-de-transplantes-na-bahia/
2. Almeida HG, Hida RY, Kara NJ. Review of developments in corneal transplantation in the regions of Brazil – Evaluation of corneal transplants in Brazil. Clinics (Sao Paulo), 2016; 71(9): 537-43. https://doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2016(09)09
3. Moriyama AS, dos Santos Forseto A, Pereira NC, Ribeiro AC, de Almeida MC, Figueras-Roca M, et al. Trends in corneal transplantation in a tertiary hospital in Brazil. Cornea, 2022; 41(7): 857-66. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0000000000002801
4. Sarlo RA, Vargas ER. Project of cornea donation in Rio de Janeiro: analysis of the implementation of an organization innovation practice. Transplant Proc, 2019; 51(6): 1661-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2019.03.044
5. Pereira Cruz GK, Ferreira Júnior MA, Pereira Frota O, Ferraz Teston E, Pereira Santos VE, Fortes Vitor A, et al. Cornea donation process and tissue quality for transplantation. PLoS One, 2021; 16(4): e0249927. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249927
6. Rocon PC, Ribeiro LP, Scárdua RF, de Almeida AV, Gomes LM, Azeredo HC, et al. Main causes of nonfulfillment of corneal donation in five hospitals of a Brazilian state. Transplant Proc, 2013; 45(3): 1038-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2013.02.008
7. Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Portaria nº 905/GM Em 16 de agosto de 2000. Brasília (DF): MS; 2000. Available at: http://www1.saude.rs.gov.br/dados/1329478247845Legislacao%20sobre%20a%20obrigatoriedade%20da%20existencia%20da%20CIHDOTT.pdf
8. Alves Arcanjo R, de Oliveira LC, Dias da Silva D. Reflexões sobre a comissão intra-hospitalar de doação de órgãos e tecidos para transplantes. Rev Bioét, 2013. 21(1): 119-25. Available at: https://www.scielo.br/j/bioet/a/zTj4dKfCN9Kd88ytWyZPKQR/?lang=pt
9. Fernandes ME, Soares MA, Boin IF, Zambelli HJ. Efficacy of social worker role in corneal donation in two different periods. Transplant Proc, 2010; 42(10): 3927-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2010.09.130
10. Witjes M, Kotsopoulos AMM, Otterspoor L, Herold IHF, Simons KS, Woittiez K, et al. The implementation of a multidisciplinary approach for potential organ donors in the emergency department. Transplantation, 2019; 103(11). https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000002701
11. Kim K, Lee SH, Kim DH, Lim D, Kang C, Jeong JH, et al. Effect of a multidisciplinary program to improve organ donation in the emergency department. Eur J Emerg Med, 2021; 28(1): 58-63. https://doi.org/10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000752
12. de Oliveira Restier RB, Knihs NDS, Salum NC, Pontes DO, Magalhães ALP, dos Santos EG, et al. Interventions to improve the quality in the organ and tissue donation process. Transplant Proc, 2023; 55(6): 1346-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2023.06.004
13. Becker F, Roberts KJ, Nadal M, Zink M, Stiegler P, Pemberger S, et al. Optimizing organ donation: expert opinion from Austria, Germany, Spain and the U.K. Ann Transplant, 2020; 25: e921727. https://doi.org/10.12659/AOT.921727
14. Alwahaibi N, Al Wahaibi A, Al Abri M. Knowledge and attitude about organ donation and transplantation among Omani university students. Front Public Health, 2023; 11: 1115531. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1115531
15. Silva A, Arora S, Dhanani S, Rochon A, Giorno LP, Jackson E, et al. Quality improvement tools to manage deceased organ donation processes: a scoping review. BMJ Open, 2023; 13(2): e070333. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070333
16. Bonfadini G, Roisman V, Prinz R, Sarlo R, Rocha E, Campos M. Donation and waiting list for corneal transplantation in the state of Rio de Janeiro. Rev Bras Oftalmol, 2014; 73(4): 237-42. https://doi.org/10.5935/0034-7280.20140051
17. Picarillo AP. Introduction to quality improvement tools for the clinician. J Perinatol, 2018; 38(7): 929-35. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-018-0100-4
18. Kaplan HC, Brady PW, Dritz MC, Hooper DK, Linam WM, Froehle CM, et al. The influence of context on quality improvement success in health care: a systematic review of the literature. Milbank Q, 2010; 88(4): 500-59. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0009.2010.00611.x
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Juliana Caldas, João Piropô, Isabella Pires, Vanessa Costa, Eduardo Rocha, Ana Verena Mendes
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
