Aprender para Viver Melhor: Tecnologias Educativas no Cuidado a Receptores de Transplante de Fígado

Nataly Mieko Nakano; Cristina Maria Galvão; Isabella Bedinelo Ferreira; Karina Dal Sasso Mendes

Autores

Nataly Mieko Nakano Universidade de São Paulo – Escola de Enfermagem – Ribeirão Preto (SP) – Brasil. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8073-786X
Cristina Maria Galvão Universidade de São Paulo – Escola de Enfermagem – Ribeirão Preto (SP) – Brasil. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4141-7107
Isabella Bedinelo Ferreira Universidade de São Paulo – Escola de Enfermagem – Ribeirão Preto (SP) – Brasil. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3785-3085
Karina Dal Sasso Mendes Universidade de São Paulo – Escola de Enfermagem – Ribeirão Preto (SP) – Brasil. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3349-2075

Palavras-chave:

Transplante de Fígado; Transplantados; Tecnologia Educacional; Educação em Saúde; Enfermagem Perioperatória.

Resumo

Objetivo: Analisar as evidências disponíveis na literatura sobre as tecnologias educativas direcionadas a receptores de transplante de fígado. Método: Revisão integrativa da literatura conduzida em seis etapas, com incorporação das recomendações do Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) e registro prévio do protocolo no Open Science Framework. A busca por estudos primários foi realizada nas bases Scopus, PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Web of Science Core Collection, Embase e Literatura Latino-Americana e do Caribe em Ciências da Saúde (LILACS), sem restrição de ano de publicação. A qualidade metodológica foi avaliada pela ferramenta do modelo Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice. Resultados: Foram incluídos 14 estudos, com desenhos metodológicos variados, incluindo ensaios clínicos randomizados e não randomizados, estudos qualitativos, de coorte, transversais, observacionais prospectivos, quase-experimentais e metodológicos. Entre as tecnologias educativas identificadas, destacaram-se aplicativos móveis, cartilhas, ferramentas eletrônicas de ensino multidisciplinar, mídias sociais, plataformas digitais, programas de mensagens de texto, mentoria, programas educativos multidisciplinares, questionários de avaliação do conhecimento e vídeos educativos com uso de tablets. Essas tecnologias mostraram-se relevantes no apoio ao ensino, no acompanhamento do tratamento e no suporte social aos receptores, promovendo adesão ao tratamento medicamentoso, monitoramento de sintomas e acesso a informações sobre o transplante e o cuidado pós-operatório. Conclusão: As evidências reforçam o papel das tecnologias educativas no cuidado aos receptores de transplante de fígado, oferecendo suporte à educação, ao monitoramento e ao apoio social. A escassez de estudos nacionais evidencia a necessidade de novas investigações que adaptem essas tecnologias às demandas da população brasileira.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

1 Battistella S, D’Arcangelo F, Grasso M, Zanetto A, Gambato M, Germani G, et al. Liver transplantation for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: indications and post-transplant management. Clin Mol Hepatol. 2023; 29 (Suppl): S286-S301. https://doi.org/10.3350/cmh.2022.0392.

2 Lai JC, Ufere NN, Bucuvalas JC. Liver transplant survivorship. Liver Transpl. 2020 aug; 26 (8): 1030-1033. https://doi.org/10.1002/lt.25792.

3 Organización Nacional de Trasplantes. Meeting the organ shortage: current status and strategies for improvement of organ donation. Madrid: ONT; 2023. [acesso em 2025 ago 15]. Disponível em: https://www.ont.es/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Meeting-the-Organ-Shortage.-Enero-2010.pdf

4 Associação Brasileira de Transplante de Órgãos. Dimensionamento dos transplantes no Brasil e em cada estado (2016-2023). São Paulo: RBT; 2023. [acesso em 2025 jun 23]. Disponível em: https://site.abto.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/RBT_2023-Populacao_Atualizado.pdf

5 Kwong AJ, Kim WR, Lake JR, Smith JM, Schladt DP, Skeans MA, et al. OPTN/SRTR 2019 Annual Data Report: liver. Am J Transplant. 2021 feb; 21(Suppl 2): 208-315. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.16494.

6 Melki CR, Fernandes JLR, Lima AS. Critério Meld na fila de transplantes: impacto na mortalidade geral e por grupos diagnósticos. Braz J Transplant. 2022; 25(2): e7222. https://doi.org/10.53855/bjt.v25i2.454_pt.

7 Craig EV, Heller MT. Complications of liver transplant. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2021; 46: 43-67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-019-02340-5.

8 Wachholz LF, Knihs NS, Sens S, Paim SMS, Magalhães ALP, Roza BA. Boas práticas no cuidado transicional: continuidade da assistência ao paciente submetido ao transplante de fígado. Rev Bras Enferm. 2021; 74 (2): e20200746. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2020-0746.

9 Guo L, Li L, Lu Y, Li T, Chen L, Jiang L, et al. Effects of empowerment education on the self-management and self-efficacy of liver transplant patients: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Nurs. 2023 apr; 22: 146. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-023-01298-6.

10 Kim SH, Kim K-A, Chu SH, Kim H, Joo DJ, Lee JG, et al. Self-management using eHealth technologies for liver transplant recipients: scoping review. J Med Internet Res. 2024; 26: e56664. https://doi.org/10.2196/56664.

11 Prochnon NP, Moreno SEM, Galvão CM, Mendes KDS. Estratégias educativas para candidatos e receptores de transplante de fígado: revisão integrativa da literatura. Braz J Transplant. 2022; 25 (3): e0322. https://doi.org/10.53855/bjt.v25i3.438_pt.

12 Dolanbay N, Ozkan M. The effect of web-based education on symptoms and adherence to immunosuppressive medications in liver transplant patients. Transplant Proc. 2025 jun; 57 (5): 803-809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2025.03.005.

13 Ziviani LC, Mendes KDS, Martins-Pedersoli T, Molina FMR, Galvão CM. Necessidades de informação a receptores de transplante de fígado. Braz J Transplant. 2021; 24 (1): 15-23. https://doi.org/10.53855/bjt.v24i1.3.

14 Toronto CE, Remington R. A step-by-step guide to conducting an integrative review. Cham: Springer; 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37504-1.

15 Mendes KDS, Silveira RCCP, Galvão CM. Revisão integrativa: método de pesquisa para a incorporação de evidências na saúde e na enfermagem. Texto Contexto Enferm. 2008 dez; 17 (4): 758-764. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-07072008000400018.

16 Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021; 372: n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71.

17 Nakano NM, Galvão CM, Mendes KDS. Educational technologies for liver transplant recipients: integrative review. Charlottesville: Open Science Framework; 2022. [atualizado em 2024 sep 8; citado em 2026 abr 26]. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/6TCUW

18 Bramer WM, Giustini D, de Jonge GB, Holland L, Bekhuis T. De-duplication of database search results for systematic reviews in EndNote. J Med Libr Assoc. 2016; 104 (3): 240-243. https://doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.104.3.014.

19 Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, Elmagarmid A. Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2016; 5: 210. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4.

20 Dang D, Dearholt SL, Bissett K, Ascenzi J, Whalen M. Johns Hopkins evidence-based practice for nurses and healthcare professionals: model & guidelines. 4 ed. Indianapolis: Sigma Theta Tau International; 2021.

21 Melnyk BM. Level of evidence plus critical appraisal of its quality yields confidence to implement evidence-based practice changes. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2016 oct; 13 (5): 337-339. https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12181.

22 Younas A, Shahzad S, Inayat S. Data analysis and presentation in integrative reviews: a narrative review. West J Nurs Res. 2022 jul; 44 (12): 1124-1133. https://doi.org/10.1177/01939459211030344.

23 Bufton S. Development of an educational booklet for children of adult liver transplant recipients. Prog Transplant. 2005 mar; 15 (1): 33-35. https://doi.org/10.1177/152692480501500106.

24 Perez C, Busch A, Oyama K, Jackson N. Collaboration to improve education after liver transplant: the experience at Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center. Prog Transplant. 2007 dec; 17 (4): 302-309. https://doi.org/10.1177/152692480701700408.

25 McLin V, Spahni S, Boggini T, Guardia A, Wildhaber BE, Geissbuhler A. KidsETransplant: a platform for liver-transplanted children. Proceedings of the 14th World Congress on Medical and Health Informatics; 2013 ago 20-23; Copenhagen: Denmark. Copenhagen: International Medical Informatics Association; 2013. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-289-9-1226.

26 Klein A, Otto G, Krämer I. Impact of a pharmaceutical care program on liver transplant patients' compliance with immunosuppressive medication: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial using electronic monitoring. Transplantation. 2009 mar; 87 (6):839-847. https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0b013e318199d122.

27 Sayegh C, Im D, Moss IK, Urquiza R, Patel S, Thomas DW. Randomized pilot trial of praise text messages to improve medication adherence among adolescents and young adults with liver transplants. Pediatr Transplant. 2022; 26 (7): e14361. https://doi.org/10.1111/petr.14361.

28 Jerson B, D'Urso C, Arnon R, Miloh T, Iyer K, Kerkar N, et al. Adolescent transplant recipients as peer mentors: a program to improve self-management and health-related quality of life. Pediatr Transplant. 2013 aug; 17 (7): 612-620. https://doi.org/10.1111/petr.12127.

29 McKenzie RB, Berquist WE, Foley MA, Park KT, Windsheimer JE, Litt IF. Text messaging improves participation in laboratory testing in adolescent liver transplant patients. J Particip Med. 2015 jul; 7: e7. [acesso em 2026 jul 30]. Disponível em: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4511378/

30 Dhar VK, Kim Y, Graff JT, Jung AD, Garrett J, Dick LE, et al. Benefit of social media on patient engagement and satisfaction: results of a 9-month, qualitative pilot study using Facebook. Surgery. 2018 mar; 163 (3): 565-570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2017.09.056.

31 Lieber SR, Kim HP, Baldelli L, Evon DM, Teal R, Nash R, et al. What liver transplant recipients want in a smartphone intervention to enhance recovery: prototype for the LiveRight transplant app. Liver Transpl. 2021 apr; 27 (4): 584-589. https://doi.org/10.1002/lt.25967.

32 Zanetti-Yabur A, Rizzo A, Hayde N, Watkins AC, Rocca JP, Graham JA. Exploring the usage of a mobile phone application in transplanted patients to encourage medication compliance and education. Am J Surg. 2017 oct; 214 (4): 743-747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.01.026.

33 Leek RB, Park JM, Koerschner C, Mawby J, Sonnenday CJ, Nunes JAW, et al. Novel educational and goal-setting tool to improve knowledge of chronic kidney disease among liver transplant recipients: a pilot study. PLoS One. 2019; 14 (7): e0219856. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219856.

34 Asavakarn S, Sirivatanauksorn Y, Promraj R, Ruenrom A, Limsrichamrern S, Kositamongkol P, et al. Systematic pharmaceutical educational approach to enhance drug adherence in liver transplant recipients. Transplant Proc. 2016; 48 (4): 1202-1207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2015.12.100.

35 Ertel AE, Kaiser TE, Abbott DE, Shah SA. Use of video-based education and tele-health home monitoring after liver transplantation: results of a novel pilot study. Surgery. 2016 oct; 160 (4): 869-876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2016.06.016.

36 Culnane E, Loftus H, Peters R, Haydar M, Hodgson A, Herd L, et al. Enabling successful transition—evaluation of a transition to adult care program for pediatric liver transplant recipients. Pediatr Transplant. 2022; 26 (3): e14213. https://doi.org/10.1111/petr.14213.

37 Merhy EE. Saúde: a cartografia do trabalho vivo. 4 ed. São Paulo: Hucitec; 2014.

38 Sabino LMM, Brasil DRM, Caetano JA, Santos MCL, Alves MDS. Uso de tecnologia leve-dura nas práticas de enfermagem: análise de conceito. Aquichan. 2016; 16 (2): 230-239. https://doi.org/10.5294/aqui.2016.16.2.10.

39 Nietsche EA, Lima MGR, Rodrigues MGS, Teixeira JA, Oliveira BNB, Motta CA, et al. Tecnologias inovadoras do cuidado em enfermagem. Rev Enferm UFSM. 2012; 2 (1):182-189. https://periodicos.ufsm.br/reufsm/article/view/3591

40 Salbego C, Nietsche EA, Teixeira E, Böck A, Cassenote LG. Tecnologias cuidativo-educacionais: um conceito em desenvolvimento. In: Teixeira E, organizadora. Desenvolvimento de tecnologias cuidativo-educacionais. Porto Alegre: Moriá; 2017. p. 31-50.

41 Nietsche EA, Backes VMS, Colomé CLM, Ceratti RN, Ferraz F. Tecnologias educacionais, assistenciais e gerenciais: uma reflexão a partir da concepção dos docentes de enfermagem. Rev Latino-Am Enfermagem. 2005 jun; 13 (3): 344-353. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-11692005000300009.

42 Bastable SB. Nurse as educator: principles of teaching and learning for nursing practice. 5 ed. Burlington: Jones & Bartlett Learning; 2019.

43 Mansouri P, Sayari R, Dehghani Z, Naimi Hosseini F. Comparison of the effect of multimedia and booklet methods on quality of life of kidney transplant patients: a randomized clinical trial study. Int J Community Based Nurs Midwifery. 2020 jan; 8 (1): 12-22. https://doi.org/10.30476/IJCBNM.2019.73958.0.

44 Haisfield-Wolfe ME, Rund C. The development and pilot testing of a teaching booklet for oncology patients' self-assessment and perineal skin care. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2002 mar; 29 (2): 88-92. https://doi.org/10.1067/mjw.2002.122107.

45 Urstad KH, Wahl AK, Andersen MH, Øyen O, Hagen KB. Limited evidence for the effectiveness of educational interventions for renal transplant recipients: results from a systematic review of controlled clinical trials. Patient Educ Couns. 2013 feb; 90 (2): 147-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2012.10.020.

46 Loban K, Horton A, Robert J-T, Hales L, Parajuli S, McAdams-DeMarco M, et al. Perspectives and experiences of kidney transplant recipients with graft failure: a systematic review and meta-synthesis. Transplant Rev (Orlando). 2023 apr; 37 (2): 100761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trre.2023.100761.

47 Marzo RR, Chen HWJ, Ahmad A, Thew HZ, Choy JS, Ng CH, et al. The evolving role of social media in enhancing quality of life: a global perspective across 10 countries. Arch Public Health. 2024; 82: 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-023-01222-z.

48 Bellini MI, Parisotto C, Dor FJMF, Kessaris N. Social media use among transplant professionals in Europe: a cross-sectional study from the European Society of Organ Transplantation. Exp Clin Transplant. 2020 apr; 18 (2): 169-176. https://doi.org/10.6002/ect.2019.0078.

49 Hunt HF, Rodrigue JR, Dew MA, Schaffer RL, Henderson ML, Bloom R, et al. Strategies for increasing knowledge, communication, and access to living donor transplantation: an evidence review to inform patient education. Curr Transplant Rep. 2018 feb; 5: 27-44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40472-018-0181-1.

50 Langham RG, Kalantar-Zadeh K, Bonner A, Balducci A, Hsiao L-L, Kumaraswami LA, et al. Kidney health for all: bridging the gap in kidney health education and literacy. Nefrologia (Engl Ed). 2022; 42 (2): 113-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nefroe.2022.05.001.

51 Fleming JN, Taber DJ, McElligott J, McGillicuddy JW, Treiber F. Mobile health in solid organ transplant: the time is now. Am J Transplant. 2017 sep; 17 (9): 2263-2276. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.14225.

52 Vanhoof JMM, Vandenberghe B, Geerts D, Philippaerts P, De Maziere P, DeVito Dabbs A, et al. Technology experience of solid organ transplant patients and their overall willingness to use interactive health technology. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2018; 50 (2): 151-162. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12362.

53 Waterman AD, Anderson C, Alem A, Peipert JD, Beaumont JL, Henry SL, et al. A randomized controlled trial of Explore Transplant at Home to improve transplant knowledge and decision-making for CKD 3-5 patients at Kaiser Permanente Southern California. BMC Nephrol. 2019 mar; 20: 78. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-019-1262-9.

54 Stevenson JK, Campbell ZC, Webster AC, Chow CK, Tong A, Craig JC, et al. eHealth interventions for people with chronic kidney disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 aug; (8): CD012379. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012379.pub2.

55 Rocha SL, Domingues RJS, Teixeira E, Lima LHA. Validação de produtos educacionais em ensino em saúde. Belém: Neurus; 2024.